Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Math Biosci Eng ; 20(2): 3661-3676, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2201224

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the present study was to develop a transmission model of COVID-19 cases with and without a contact history to understand the meaning of the proportion of infected individuals with a contact history over time. We extracted epidemiological information regarding the proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases with a contact history and analyzed incidence data stratified by the presence of a contact history in Osaka from January 15 to June 30, 2020. To clarify the relationship between transmission dynamics and cases with a contact history, we used a bivariate renewal process model to describe transmission among cases with and without a contact history. We quantified the next-generation matrix as a function of time; thus, the instantaneous (effective) reproduction number was calculated for different periods of the epidemic wave. We objectively interpreted the estimated next-generation matrix and replicated the proportion of cases with a contact p(t) over time, and we examined the relevance to the reproduction number. We found that p(t) does not take either the maximum or minimum value at a threshold level of transmission with R(t)=1.0. With R(t) < 1 (subcritical level), p(t) was a decreasing function of R(t). Qualitatively, the minimum p(t) was seen in the domain with R(t) > 1. An important future implication for use of the proposed model is to monitor the success of ongoing contact tracing practice. A decreasing signal of p(t) reflects the increasing difficulty of contact tracing. The present study findings indicate that monitoring p(t) would be a useful addition to surveillance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epidemics , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Japan , Contact Tracing
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 933, 2022 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been descriptively argued that the case fatality risk (CFR) of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is elevated when medical services are overwhelmed. The relationship between CFR and pressure on health-care services should thus be epidemiologically explored to account for potential epidemiological biases. The purpose of the present study was to estimate the age-dependent CFR in Tokyo and Osaka over time, investigating the impact of caseload demand on the risk of death. METHODS: We estimated the time-dependent CFR, accounting for time delay from diagnosis to death. To this end, we first determined the time distribution from diagnosis to death, allowing variations in the delay over time. We then assessed the age-dependent CFR in Tokyo and Osaka. In Osaka, the risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was also estimated. RESULTS: The CFR was highest among individuals aged 80 years and older and during the first epidemic wave from February to June 2020, estimated as 25.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.1 to 29.6) and 27.9% (95% CI 20.6 to 36.1) in Tokyo and Osaka, respectively. During the fourth wave of infection (caused by the Alpha variant) in Osaka the CFR among the 70s and ≥ 80s age groups was, respectively, 2.3 and 1.5 times greater than in Tokyo. Conversely, despite the surge in hospitalizations, the risk of ICU admission among those aged 80 and older in Osaka decreased. Such time-dependent variation in the CFR was not seen among younger patients < 70 years old. With the Omicron variant, the CFR among the 80s and older in Tokyo and Osaka was 3.2% (95% CI 3.0 to 3.5) and 2.9% (95% CI 2.7 to 3.1), respectively. CONCLUSION: We found that without substantial control, the CFR can increase when a surge in cases occurs with an identifiable elevation in risk-especially among older people. Because active treatment options including admission to ICU cannot be offered to the elderly with an overwhelmed medical service, the CFR value can potentially double compared with that in other areas of health care under less pressure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Humans , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospital Bed Capacity , Intensive Care Units
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 937732, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2099171

ABSTRACT

Background: Public health and social measures (PHSM) against COVID-19 in Japan involve requesting the public to voluntarily reduce social contact; these measures are not legally binding. The effectiveness of such PHSM has been questioned with emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant (B.1.1.7), which exhibited elevated transmissibility. Materials and Methods: We investigated the epidemic dynamics during the fourth epidemic wave in Japan from March to June 2021 involving pre-emergency measures and declaration of a state of emergency (SoE). We estimated the effective reproduction number (R t ) before and after these interventions, and then analyzed the relationship between lower R t values and each PHSM. Results: With implementation of pre-emergency measures (PEM) in 16 prefectures, the R t was estimated to be < 1 in six prefectures; its average relative reduction ranged from 2 to 19%. During the SoE, 8 of 10 prefectures had an estimated R t < 1, and the average relative reduction was 26%-39%. No single intervention was identified that uniquely resulted in an R t value < 1. Conclusion: An SoE can substantially reduce the R t and may be required to curb a surge in cases caused by future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern with elevated transmissibility. More customized interventions did not reduce the R t value to < 1 in this study, but that may be partly attributable to the greater transmissibility of the Alpha variant.

4.
Front Public Health ; 10: 837970, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1911114

ABSTRACT

Background: Osaka, the third largest prefecture in Japan, experienced a rapid replacement of preexisting strains of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by variant alpha during March-April 2021. Assessing the burden of variant alpha on health centers and medical institutions is vital to anticipating the surge of patients. The present study aimed to estimate the age-dependent risks of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) putatively caused by variant alpha in Japan, focusing on epidemiological dynamics in Osaka. Methods: Descriptive analyses were conducted using data on confirmed, severe and fatal cases of COVID-19 from 16 November 2020 to 22 May 2021. All cases were divided into 6-9 age groups to compare the risks of confirmed diagnosis, severe illness and death from COVID-19 with variant alpha to those caused by preexisting strains. Results: Individuals with COVID-19 aged under 30 years were more likely to be infected with variant alpha than those in their 40s. The incidence of severe illness and death among all age groups with COVID-19 due to variant alpha was higher than that due to preexisting strains. Patients older than 40 years experienced an increased risk of severe illness and death if infected with variant alpha. However, the proportion of severe cases was lower in the group aged 80 years and older infected with variant alpha than in those infected with preexisting strains. Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that the incidence of infection among young people aged below 30 years old increased relative to ordinary strains. Risks of severe illness and death in patients with variant alpha COVID-19 was higher than in those with preexisting strains in Osaka, Japan. However, a decrease in the risk of severe illness was observed in people aged ≥80 years, which is probably because medical facilities in Osaka were overwhelmed in April and May 2021. Continuous monitoring of COVID-19 cases with new variants is vital to secure sufficient medical resources for all patients who require medical care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescent , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology
5.
International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications ; 13(1):2971-2983, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1811863

ABSTRACT

Survival functions estimators can be affected by outlier, and thus these estimations move away from their real values, especially with the increasing in the outlier ratios within the sample of the random variable. The research included a comparison of a number of Bayesian methods for the estimations of survival functions of burr-X distribution with the percentages of different outliers within the sample. Simulation results showed the effect of the estimation methods by sample size and the percentage of outliers, and the real values of the parameters distribution. Mean square error was adopted as a measure to compare the estimation methods with a number of simulation experiments. The research also included a case study of Covid-19 for practical application. Other estimation methods can be taken (maximum likelihood estimation method, moment method, and shrinkage method) to note the possibility of being affected by outlier values

6.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) ; 184(2):454-455, 2021.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1723397

ABSTRACT

Comments on an article by Glenn Shafer (see record 2021-44219-001). It is exciting to follow Glenn Shafer's investigations into forecasting, betting, reasoning with uncertainty and foundational issues in probability, beginning with his 1973 PhD thesis at Princeton and culminating in Shafer on the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief functions, and its evolution during the past five decades to the present paper on betting scores and game-theoretic probability. Betting scores are particularly relevant in this momentous year of intensive global search for COVID19 vaccines and treatments, and upcoming presidential and congressional elections in the United States, about which pundits keep giving time-varying forecasts of the outcomes while betting markets on presidential election odds have been particularly active, similar to online sports betting markets. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

7.
Epidemics ; 38: 100547, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1700614

ABSTRACT

The estimation of parameters and model structure for informing infectious disease response has become a focal point of the recent pandemic. However, it has also highlighted a plethora of challenges remaining in the fast and robust extraction of information using data and models to help inform policy. In this paper, we identify and discuss four broad challenges in the estimation paradigm relating to infectious disease modelling, namely the Uncertainty Quantification framework, data challenges in estimation, model-based inference and prediction, and expert judgement. We also postulate priorities in estimation methodology to facilitate preparation for future pandemics.


Subject(s)
Pandemics , Forecasting , Uncertainty
8.
Math Biosci Eng ; 19(3): 2750-2761, 2022 01 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1667423

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has rapidly spread across the globe. The variant of concern (VOC) 202012/01 (B.1.1.7, also known as the alpha variant) bearing the N501Y mutation emerged in late 2020. VOC 202012/01 was more transmissible than existing SARS-CoV-2 variants and swiftly became dominant in many regions. More than 150 cases of VOC 202012/01 were reported in Japan by 26 February 2021. During the very early stage of introduction, only a subset arose from domestic transmission. If the reproduction number R (i.e., the average number of secondary transmission events caused by a single primary case) is greater than 1, the corresponding proportion should converge to 1 in a short period of time, and thus it is critical to understand the transmissibility of VOC 202012/01 based on travel history information. The present study aimed to estimate R of VOC 202012/01 using overseas travel history information. A mathematical model was developed to capture the relationship between travel history and R. We obtained travel history data for each confirmed case of VOC 202012/01 infection from 26 December 2020 to 26 February 2021. Maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate R, accounting for right censoring during real-time estimation. In the baseline scenario, R was estimated at 2.11 (95% confidence interval: 1.63, 2.94). By 26 February 2021, an average of nine generations had elapsed since the first imported case. If the generation time of VOC 202012/01 was assumed to be longer, R was increased, consistent with estimates of R from case data. The estimated R of VOC 202012/01 in Japan exceeded 1 on 26 February 2021, suggesting that domestic transmission events caused a major epidemic. Moreover, because our estimate of R was dependent on generation time and ascertainment biases, continuous monitoring of contact tracing data is crucial to decipher the mechanisms of increased VOC 202012/01 transmissibility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Mutation , SARS-CoV-2/genetics
9.
Theor Biol Med Model ; 18(1): 13, 2021 07 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1403242

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Japan, a part of confirmed patients' samples have been screened for the variant of concern (VOC), including the variant alpha with N501Y mutation. The present study aimed to estimate the actual number of cases with variant alpha and reconstruct the epidemiological dynamics. METHODS: The number of cases with variant alpha out of all PCR confirmed cases was estimated, employing a hypergeometric distribution. An exponential growth model was fitted to the growth data of variant alpha cases over fourteen weeks in Tokyo. RESULTS: The weekly incidence with variant alpha from 18-24 January 2021 was estimated at 4.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7, 44.0) cases. The expected incidence in early May ranged from 420-1120 cases per week, and the reproduction number of variant alpha was on the order of 1.5 even under the restriction of contact from January-March, 2021, Tokyo. CONCLUSIONS: The variant alpha was predicted to swiftly dominate COVID-19 cases in Tokyo, and this has actually occurred by May 2021. Devising the proposed method, any country or location can interpret the virological sampling data.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Tokyo/epidemiology
10.
J Clin Med ; 9(10)2020 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-905687

ABSTRACT

The crude case fatality risk (CFR) for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Singapore is remarkably small. We aimed to estimate the unbiased CFR by age for Singapore and Japan and compare these estimates by calculating the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Age-specific CFRs for COVID-19 were estimated in real time, adjusting for the delay from illness onset to death. The SMR in Japan was estimated by using the age distribution of the Singapore population. Among cases aged 60-69 years and 70-79 years, the age-specific CFRs in Singapore were estimated as 1.84% (95% confidence interval: 0.46-4.72%) and 5.57% (1.41-13.97%), respectively, and those in Japan as 5.52% (4.55-6.62%) and 15.49% (13.81-17.27%), respectively. The SMR of COVID-19 in Japan, when compared with Singapore as the baseline, was estimated to be 1.46 (1.09-2.96). The overall CFR for Singapore is lower than that for Japan. It is possible that the circulating variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Singapore causes a milder clinical course of COVID-19 infection compared with other strains. If infection with a low-virulence SARS-CoV-2 variant provides protection against infection by high-virulence strains, the existence of such a strain is encouraging news for the many countries struggling to suppress this virus.

11.
J Clin Med ; 9(2)2020 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-827199

ABSTRACT

To understand the severity of infection for a given disease, it is common epidemiological practice to estimate the case fatality risk, defined as the risk of death among cases. However, there are three technical obstacles that should be addressed to appropriately measure this risk. First, division of the cumulative number of deaths by that of cases tends to underestimate the actual risk because deaths that will occur have not yet observed, and so the delay in time from illness onset to death must be addressed. Second, the observed dataset of reported cases represents only a proportion of all infected individuals and there can be a substantial number of asymptomatic and mildly infected individuals who are never diagnosed. Third, ascertainment bias and risk of death among all those infected would be smaller when estimated using shorter virus detection windows and less sensitive diagnostic laboratory tests. In the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic, health authorities must cope with the uncertainty in the risk of death from COVID-19, and high-risk individuals should be identified using approaches that can address the abovementioned three problems. Although COVID-19 involves mostly mild infections among the majority of the general population, the risk of death among young adults is higher than that of seasonal influenza, and elderly with underlying comorbidities require additional care.

12.
J Clin Med ; 9(3)2020 Feb 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-3329

ABSTRACT

To understand the time-dependent risk of infection on a cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, I estimated the incidence of infection with novel coronavirus (COVID-19). The epidemic curve of a total of 199 confirmed cases was drawn, classifying individuals into passengers with and without close contact and crew members. A backcalculation method was employed to estimate the incidence of infection. The peak time of infection was seen for the time period from 2 to 4 February 2020, and the incidence has abruptly declined afterwards. The estimated number of new infections among passengers without close contact was very small from 5 February on which a movement restriction policy was imposed. Without the intervention from 5 February, it was predicted that the cumulative incidence with and without close contact would have been as large as 1373 (95% CI: 570, 2176) and 766 (95% CI: 587, 946) cases, respectively, while these were kept to be 102 and 47 cases, respectively. Based on an analysis of illness onset data on board, the risk of infection among passengers without close contact was considered to be very limited. Movement restriction greatly reduced the number of infections from 5 February onwards.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL